In this paper, we address the problem of defining a general framework that can be used to formalize the steps that lead two officers in one case or a group of more than two officers in the other to reach agreement on the meaning of a number of terms. In particular, we define once we have defined a logical framework to represent the situation of two agents negotiating, an algorithm that automates the meaning negotiation process, and study its computational properties. We expand the algorithm to a framework where there are more than two bargaining agents. to make an agreement or to end an argument with someone to secure or conclude a win/deal/agreement, etc., so they will get agreement on a subject that people have differing opinions about agreeing, In order to be part of an official agreement or contract, something like an agreement or agreement whereby both parties get an advantage or advantage Although a great deal of attention has been brought to this subject in the recent literature of artificial intelligence and representation of knowledge, the results of these surveys depend on the number of agents involved. The mechanism for obtaining agreement has been widely studied in the theatre-like gaming community, but only for quantitative objects that need to be negotiated. after discussing or thinking long and hard about agreeing, after discussing or negotiating something stuffing against “dressing”, do you know the difference? “Affect” vs. “Effect”: Use the right word every time transactions on Intelligence Collective VII Pp 1-42 Cite as “Epidemic” vs. “Pandemic” vs. “Endmic”: What do these terms mean?.